Skip to main content
Back to articles
PhilosophyPsychologyAnalysis

The Blame Game: Big Bad Men and Our Quest for Simplicity

Why conspiracy theories are so appealing and what they reveal about human nature. An exploration of our tendency to find simple explanations for complex problems.

15 min read
Strahil Peykov

Big Bad Men and Our Quest for Simplicity

Originally written September 12, 2023 - An exploration of why conspiracy theories are so appealing and what they reveal about human nature.

Conspiracy theories, with their intricate webs of cause and effect, have taken root in the human psyche. These theories often revolve around the idea of a global cabal, a small and secret group that manipulates global events around the world, who are of course evil and have ill intentions. A story as old as time, but why does it appeal so much to the masses?

The Anatomy of a Conspiracy Theory

Simplicity of Belief

There's an allure in simplicity. If one believes in the global cabal, it saves them the trouble of understanding the complexities of the world. Ukrainian politics? 5G technology? COVID-19? It all boils down to the shadowy actions of this secretive group. No need to delve deep, no need to wrap your head around multifaceted issues. Just blame it on the "Big Bad Guy". As attractive as it is lazy. And hey, it's not just about the blame. It's about the hope. The fantasy that if we just unmask this cabal, from epidemics to poverty, everything would magically resolve. No more Israeli-Palestinian conflict, no more issues in Ukraine. Sounds easy, right?

The Universal 'Bad Guys'

Every single group, left or right-leaning, seems to have its villains. For redpillers, it's 'slut women' and feminists, for progressives, it's white colonialists, for conservatives, it's the "deep state"[1] or the Jews, depending on how far right you go. This need to externalize blame seems to be a human tendency rather than merely an ideological one. Rather than addressing personal inadequacies or larger systemic issues, individuals find it easier to pinpoint a scapegoat. It's a mindset that allows for the avoidance of self-responsibility and personal growth, pushing the blame to a larger, more abstract entity.

The Fallacy of Omnipotence

The rather tragic aspect of conspiracy theories is their insistence on explaining every setback, mistake, or unexplained phenomenon through the lens of a sinister, secret, and omnipotent global cabal. This is almost a universal rule for conspiracy theories: the greater the perceived obstacle or confusion, the more powerful this mysterious group must be.

Take for instance the frequent murmurs about intelligence agencies. Whispers about the CIA or Mossad orchestrating global events are plenty. Yet, history stands as a testament to their myriad of blunders. Their successes might be legendary, but their missteps are equally monumental.

Reflect on the Russian invasion of Ukraine, for instance. Prior to the conflict, the perception was that Putin was an unparalleled strategist and the Russian army among the strongest. Yet, their miscalculations and poor discipline during the invasion were evident to all[2][3]. Instead of understanding these events as they were – errors in judgment or overreaching ambitions – conspiracy enthusiasts would paint it as an orchestrated chaos by a NATO-driven USA military-industrial complex. Did this cabal put a gun to Putin's head and tell him to invade?

The Core Problem

The strength and, paradoxically, the weakness of conspiracy theories is that they can morph and evolve to explain everything. It doesn't demand intellectual integrity, but intellectual convenience. However, there's a grain of truth in their underlying sentiment. The genuine, justified fear of people feeling they're losing grip over their lives or not comprehending the rapid changes around them is real and palpable. The world is indeed fraught with challenges, not from a group of secretive individuals, but from threats like unregulated AI advancements or the looming threat of global warming.

The key difference between conspiracy theorists and those warning about real-world issues is in identifying the 'enemy'. Those wary of AI and climate change see the issues as external to humanity, problems we've collectively contributed to but can address. In contrast, conspiracy theories often blame specific groups of humans, causing division and animosity. Such theories not only spread hate but also cultivate helplessness and division, distracting us from the actual challenges ahead.

The Historical Context

Nazism as a Conspiracy Theory

This proclivity for external blame isn't new. When we think of Nazism, it's often viewed as a robust political ideology, but at its core, Nazism originated as exactly a conspiracy theory. The foundational premise of Nazi ideology was straightforward yet sinister: Jews control the world, and by eradicating them, all of the world's problems would be solved. One of the intriguing facets of such theories is their capacity to connect seemingly opposing forces under the umbrella of a grand conspiracy. To illustrate, the Nazis propagated the belief that while communism and capitalism appear to be polar opposites, they were, in reality, both manipulated by Jews. "Ah, this is what the Jews want you to think," they'd claim, asserting that figures like Trotsky and Marx from the communist side, and influential entities like the Rothschilds and Wall Street from the capitalist side, were all pawns in this vast Jewish conspiracy. This narrative even extended to the aftermath of the Holocaust, with claims that the Soviets, despite being adversaries, were in on the deception. The allure of such conspiracy theories is the semblance of understanding they provide: "Now it all makes sense!" And, with this "understanding" in hand, the solution becomes deceptively simple: give power to Hitler, eliminate the Jews, and all the world's problems magically disappear.

The Flaws in Global Cabal Theories

Plans Go Wrong

The foremost flaw in global cabal theories is their underlying assumption: that a minuscule group of individuals not only orchestrates but flawlessly executes the world's events. To believe in such theories is to overlook the fundamental unpredictability and complexity of the world.

The notion that a handful of people can steer the course of world affairs with pinpoint accuracy is far-fetched at best. The intricacy of global events is incredible. Some even argue that policy is downright impossible due to the immense challenge of accurately predicting or influencing human behavior. Thus, entertaining the idea that a shadowy group has not just cracked this code, but has done so consistently, is wishful thinking.

For a taste of how plans can unravel, one need not look further than the American invasion of Iraq in 2003[4]. Here was a superpower, equipped with unmatched military prowess and intelligence agencies like the FBI and CIA, embarking on a mission to reshape the Middle East. But what happened? The meticulous plans fell apart. The bid to establish a new order led to chaos. Instead of cutting terrorism, the invasion accidentally fostered it, giving rise to ISIS. The ironic twist? The major benefactor was Iran, who, without lifting a finger, took the rewards served on a silver plate by American intervention. This episode in history, among countless others, underscores that even the most formidable forces, armed with elaborate plans, can stumble. If planning a simple event like a birthday surprise can go awry, imagine the improbability of orchestrating global events!

The Myth of Remaining Secret

The second fallacy is the belief that these puppeteers can operate in perpetual secrecy. While small groups might guard secrets for a short while, orchestrating world events in hush-hush mode is fantasy. There would need to be hundreds of thousands of individuals 'in the know'—all maintaining this secret, all while orchestrating harm against their own people.

History has shown that power often comes with a spotlight, not shadows. Take Xi Jinping and the CCP's grip on China[5]. Their influence over the military, media, economy, and academia isn't some whispered secret—it's overt and known. Similarly, Hitler's rise wasn't secret. He thrived in the limelight. Those who genuinely amass power don't hide in the dark; they make use of publicity. To think that an omnipotent cabal can lurk in the shadows, evading every possible slip or leak, is to deny the very nature of power and human behavior. Life is riddled with unforeseen events; to believe that every hiccup, blunder, or accident is a part of some grand design is to live in denial of life's inherent unpredictability.

The Lure of Belonging

There's a yearning in every human to belong, to be part of something bigger. And what's bigger than a global fight against unseen forces? From frustrated Muslims in Europe drawn to ISIS[6], feeling out of place and wanting to be part of a "greater calling," to redpillers fighting against the perceived onslaught of 'slut women' and feminism – it's all about being a part of the bigger picture.

The Recruitment Strategy

"Feeling oppressed by the West? Come fight with us. Believe feminists are ruining masculinity? Subscribe to our channel. Convinced Jews are trying to overpower the white race? Follow us on Substack. Do you feel like Fauci and the CDC are doing everything they can to keep you unhealthy? Buy my herbal supplements."

It's the same recruitment strategy with different actors. Just like a broken record, replayed for those who feel lost. Sadly, society today is full of folks looking for that big bad guy to blame. And this isn't a new problem; humanity has always had this issue. But when you reduce everything to a singular enemy, you're oversimplifying a world that's inherently messy and complicated.

Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles

In today's digital age, one's worldview is largely shaped by the information they consume. However, not all information spheres are created equal. Enter: Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles.

Epistemic Bubbles

An Epistemic Bubble refers to an informational network where certain viewpoints are promoted and highlighted while others are actively excluded. Think of an individual who only reads the New York Times, or exclusively follows a certain Twitter feed. Their understanding of world events is limited to the angle presented by these sources. Introduce them to a new source or a different perspective, and they might actually reassess their beliefs.

Echo Chambers

However, Echo Chambers are far worse. In this setting, not only does one receive a singular perspective, but there's also an active mechanism that discredits all external viewpoints. This means that any contrary information or viewpoint isn't just ignored; it's viewed as an attack or a lie. It's like telling a devout follower of Alex Jones, Tim Pool, or Donald Trump about a report from the BBC. Their immediate reaction? "Of course the BBC would say that. They're biased." "Of course, the CDC is corrupted by Fauci," or "The New York Times? Controlled by XYZ." This inherent mistrust and denial of contradictory data act as a reinforcement mechanism. The more you challenge their belief, the stronger it gets.

This behavior mirrors the mindset often seen in cults. When members are presented with factual evidence contradicting the cult's teachings, they don't question the cult; they take the evidence as further proof of the world's corruption.

Breaking out of such an entrenched mindset is challenging. As research suggests, an individual might need a complete "epistemic reset"[7]. It means questioning everything they know and starting afresh, building their knowledge base from the ground up using critical thinking. A daunting task, undoubtedly, but perhaps the only way to truly escape the clutches of such echo chambers.

Personal Virtues

In a world full of issues, from climate change to socio-political tensions, it's easy to feel overwhelmed. However, it's crucial to remember the scope of individual influence. While it's noble to want to change the world, such an aspiration can lead to feelings of inadequacy and defeat.

What's within our reach is making a tangible difference in our immediate surroundings. Instead of aiming to alter global narratives, focus on influencing your local community. Advocate for cleaner streets, volunteer at a local shelter, or simply be a beacon of kindness and empathy. These micro-actions, when accumulated, can have a macro impact.

The digital age, with its globalized perspective, often makes us forget our immediate sphere of influence. Yet, it's precisely in these areas where our efforts can bear the most fruit. Remember, every global movement starts at a local level.

Understanding

In a world of diverse opinions, it's vital to approach conspiracy theorists not with disdain, but with empathy. While it's easy to label them as "misguided" or "deluded", remember that many genuinely believe they're unveiling a grave threat to society. Their intentions, although based on skewed information, might stem from genuine concern.

Labeling such individuals as "evil" or "malicious" only exacerbates the divide. Instead, approach them with patience and understanding. While you might not change their beliefs overnight, establishing a rapport can pave the way for constructive dialogue.

In conclusion, as we navigate the complexities of the 21st century, understanding, empathy, and personal virtue become our guiding lights. Rather than getting lost in divisive narratives, let's focus on forging connections, championing truth, and making our immediate world a better place. When you wake up in the morning, the question is: Do you want to spend your day spreading hatred or do you want to spend your day trying to make allies and progress together?

"People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people."
— Alan Moore, V for Vendetta

Bonus Meme

Victimhood and entitlement are the two most damaging traits to mix in your average person. It's the heady concoction of "I deserve X, and Y-people are the reason I don't have it!" Yet, if we've learned anything from Kanye West, it's that pointing fingers rarely leads to resolution. Instead, it just becomes a chorus of, "Let's play the blame game, I love you more. Let's call out names, names, I hate you more." Let's not fall into that rhythm. Instead, let's strive for understanding and growth. Because at the end of it all, as Kanye muses, maybe we just need a little 'reupholstering'. And remember, sometimes, Yeezy does teach us well.

Written By
Strahil Peykov

References

[1] "More than 1 in 3 Americans believe a 'deep state' is working to undermine Trump," Ipsos, Dec. 30, 2020. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/npr-misinformation-123020

[2] "Putin watches single tank drive down Red Square in scaled-back Victory Day Parade." https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/05/09/putin-victory-day-parade-red-square-single-tank/

[3] K. Schake, "Perspective | Russia's military is incompetent. That makes it more dangerous.," Washington Post, Mar. 17, 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/03/17/russia-military-failing-dangerous/

[4] "The Iraq War," Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/timeline/iraq-war

[5] H. Davidson, "Xi Jinping warns China won't be bullied in speech marking 100-year anniversary of CCP," The Guardian, Jul. 01, 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/01/xi-jinping-warns-china-wont-be-bullied-100-year-anniversary-chinese-communist-party-

[6] F. Khosrokhavar, "The Birth of the Islamic State and its Impact on European Youth," in Jihadism in Europe: European Youth and the New Caliphate, F. Khosrokhavar, Ed., Oxford University Press, 2021, p. 0. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780197564967.003.0002.

[7] C. T. Nguyen, "ECHO CHAMBERS AND EPISTEMIC BUBBLES," Episteme, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 141–161, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1017/epi.2018.32.

#Psychology#Society#Conspiracy Theories#Human Nature#Philosophy